Too Vague on Carbon?

During yesterday’s State of the Union, the President stated, “if Congress won't process quickly to secure our children and grandchildren, I am going to.” Mr. President recognized (repeatedly, while he performed in his first presentation) which the research sustaining the threat of climate change and exceedingly high climate occasions cannot be denied. Critics from each side immediately attacked the President for what he stated or failed to say, turning up the heat on a "hot" issue.

Thomas Pyle, President of this Institute for Energy Research (IER) said, "It is showing that The President appeared much more concerned about global warming than job opportunity creating.... For this administration, a lethal storm means a way for carbon taxes."

Take the Low Carbon Challenge today.

On the other side, Forecast the Facts campaign director Daniel Souweine explained, “When we are excited to hear the President connect the dots among global warming and more and more severe weather, accurately describing the issue is not nearly enough. This evening, The President arranged the bottom possible bar in working order -- he could not pledge to stop the carbon-spewing Keystone XL Pipeline neither pledge carbon rules on current energy plants. Actually, he promised no particular actions at all."

Bruce Babbitt, Clinton’s Secretary in the Interior, compared Mr. Obama's report fot it of the predecessors, claiming that the two President George H.W. Bush as well as President Bill Clinton performed more regarding protecting community land to offset what was getting started out for traditional energy expansion. “So far under President Obama, industry has been winning the race as it obtains an increasing number of land with regard to oil and gas,” he stated. The benefit from protecting community places, of course, is simply because they could assist sequester carbon and thus offset petroleum development (for an explanation look at "Why Growing Trees is Awesome" in the latest Planet Aid Article).

One brief sentence that droped under the radar of individuals answering Mr. Obama concerned China: “As long as nations such as China keep going all-in on neat energy, and so should we,” stated Mr. Obama. It is true that China is seeking clean sources of energy, particularly solar energy. Nevertheless, China is far more dark compared to eco-friendly, having recently exceeded the United States as the leading glasshouse gas emitter. China is investing much more insistently in electrical power, however it also has made clear it fully expects its charcoal pollutants to continue to rise. China is hence not as "all-in" to clean energy as the President claims.

Rather than laud China's route, the President could have described the Chinese contradiction and also demanded that we as a country do better. The United States could be the leader within green technology as well as energy utilize and at the same time do our best to lower its charcoal footprint. Our leaders must push for the purpose of change and also, at the same time, we have to alter our personal behavior to less usage and more effective resource use. Planet Aid challenges each U . s citizens to do something specific in lessening our collective charcoal emission. Take the Low-Carbon Challenge today.